Wednesday, April 25, 2007

"Missing" or "Lost" Karl Rove of-the-RNC Emails

When I first heard about this a couple weeks ago, the politics of the situation were the most intriguing element of this story: Did Karl Rove, adviser to the President, try to subvert the Hatch Act, which provides for full accounting of all communications from, to and within the White House, by using his RNC-funded and maintained email for his secret, and potentially, illegal work as an employee of the American people?

For most people, that alone is intriguing. For me, though, I also liked the fact that this little debacle has brought to a more public light some little known facts:
  • In cyberspace, there is almost always a server with something that's passed through it, with traces and back-ups of email.
  • While email could certainly be completely lost (any NetAdmin will tell you that files can get corrupted, either in Microsoft Exchange Server or with any Linux flavor, and also be in between backup times...), it is pretty unlikely.
    • The sender has to delete it from "sent items", then delete it from "deleted items"
    • the receiver has to delete it from "received items", then delete it from "deleted items"
    • the best practice in the IT industry is to create archive folders for a user to personally retrieve old emails, so most users actually just archive their email. So to delete it from there, you have to perform another delete action (that's three, so far!).
    • Depending on the business, some backup servers also back up hard drives on user's workstations, so it would have to be deleted from there, as well.
    • Then, on the server side, the typical time for data to reside on an email server is 30 days, but that is backed up every day, so theoretically, depending on the back-up practices of the company, you might have several years worth of backups on tape.
    • Current practice due to Sarbanes-Oxley is to archive every month of data going back 7 years in "easily retrievable formats" which has been taken by many CIOs and IT Directors to be DVD-ROM discs, so any publicly traded company should have these at least back to 2004. Other companies are adopting these as best practices for IT and accounting purposes.
    • The receiving server also keeps data at least for 30 days. Depending on the company practices of these backups, these might also exist.
  • It is pretty easy to willfully delete emails if there is a strict policy of doing so on the sender's side, but not so easy on the receiver's side, so more than likely, copies of these emails could be retrieved. I've heard of IT departments of law firms charging approximately $2 per retrieved email as a standard cost, but I'm sure it could be more expensive depending on the above-mentioned standards implemented.
It is interesting that 35 years ago, tapes were erased by a secretive White House that did not want the Public (or even just Congress) to hear what it had said. If the RNC and Rove did their jobs well, and did indeed erase any of the evidence that illegal things were done in the Administrative Branch of the United States, then we might never be able to answer some of the questions about how we were led to war, what the political reasons were for firing state's attorneys, or what happened in the energy commission chaired by Cheney & Rove.

But I'm willing to bet that we CAN retrieve this information, that is, if it is legally allowable, because technology allows this capability.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

There is always the possibility ROVE and company are smart enough to use PGP

Anonymous said...

I am willing to be they used PGP on some of those emails. If so, even if they are recovered they cannot be deciphered.

Dave Tainer said...

Even if they are using PGP, Rove has a key, and he would have to give the key as part of any subpeona.

Anonymous said...

And you think he will not "forget it" like Gonzalez forgot things on the stand?

Dave Tainer said...

It's possible that they did use PGP. It's also possible if they did, that the private keys of this are "deleted" somewhere on a government computer. They can be retrieved unless he wiped his hard-drive a 100 times while he was using it. This is highly unlikely.

For anyone following this thread and perhaps not being familiar with PGP, I heartily suggest the use of this free software (http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/versions/freeware/) which stands for Pretty Good Privacy, and is basically an encryption algorithm. You create a public key that anyone can retrieve and you create a private key that only you can supply for someone to read the message, be it in a document or in an email.

To get back to the topic at hand, remember, this is PRETTY GOOD privacy, not PERFECT privacy--so yes, the algorithm could be cracked by NSA types if they were asked.

mistermxyztplk said...

While it is ludicrous to suggest any 16-year-old could retrieve these e-mails, it's not impossible to get them. I think the main stumbling block here is not technology -- it's political will. I think the Dems are a little bit leery of launching too many witch-hunts ala Gingrinch and Co. vs. Clinton in the 90s.

Dave Tainer said...

That is certainly the case of why these probably will not be "uncovered"--who has the stomach for this anymore. Horrible thought--everyone wants to see justice done--but the political reality is that people want to see clear issues resolved clearly. That's why the Iraq War has become such a problem for the administration.